Software Helps With Indictment in Texas Fraud Case
Galveston, Texas — Law enforcement officials know too
well that a criminal can’t be brought to justice unless
a jury understands the crime. The Galveston County Auto Crimes
Task Force recently encountered a criminal scheme so complex
that explaining it clearly to a grand jury would ordinarily
have been a difficult, day-long challenge. But with the help
of sophisticated software called Watson®, the Task Force
made a clear and convincing argument in just 15 minutes, securing
an indictment.
The multi-jurisdictional Auto Crimes Task Force is dedicated
to fighting commercial auto theft, as well as other vehicle-related
crimes. Among the many things that are big in Texas, the recent
reduction in auto theft is certainly a source of pride. Statewide
auto theft dropped 36 percent over a 5 year period, according
to the Texas Automobile Theft Prevention Authority (TATPA),
which was established in 1991 by the state legislature. TATPA
funds the Auto Crimes Task Force, in concert with the citizens
of Galveston County.
When the Task Force presented its findings to the grand
jury in this complex theft and fraud case, it was aided by
the intelligence analysis capability of Watson. Watson automates
the intelligence analysis process and represents findings
in chart form. These capabilities saved the Task Force time
and money in analyzing the data and creating a compelling
presentation.
By modelling the offender’s illicit activities in Watson,
the Task Force were able to generate charts automatically
that clearly showed how different parts of this scheme worked
in relationship to one another, explained Sergeant Mike Creech,
who directed the Task Force effort. The software has more
than paid for itself by bringing clarity to the Task Force’s
grand jury presentation and saving weeks of work in its development,
he said.
Watson helped officials on the case sort out what Sergeant
Creech described as “a major paperwork nightmare.”
The case involved the manager of a body shop at an auto dealership
who was stealing auto parts, filing bogus insurance claims,
making kickbacks to an independent adjuster, and pocketing
insurance deductibles paid in cash. He would apply other customers’
insurance deductible checks to cover his trail.
The Task Force reviewed a years’ worth of financial
records from the body shop, which filled two large file boxes.
Investigators meticulously chronicled inventory, insurance
claims and cash deductibles. They were able to trace, for
example, when one person’s insurance deductible paid
by check was fraudulently applied to another customer’s
deductible paid in cash.
As if the sheer complexity of the data wasn’t frustrating
enough for investigators, additional paperwork that would
have supported the investigation was destroyed by the defendant’s
internal auditor, allegedly by accident. The Task Force had
to piece together the sequence of transactions in this multilayered
scam using partial information.
Watson was not yet on board when the year-long investigation
began, so investigators analyzed data and charted relationships
among transactions manually. But the static nature of manual
charting was at odds with the constant changes inherent to
an ongoing investigation.
“If you’re in the middle of the investigation
and you draw a chart, then every time you get new information
you have to redraw the chart,” said Sergeant Creech.
“It’s time consuming.”
When Watson arrived; investigators were able to automatically
generate updated charts as new discoveries unfolded. Analysis
time was dramatically reduced.
The Task Force chose to present to the grand jury a two-month
snapshot of the case that was representative of the year-long
scam. The investigative team spent five days selecting a period
of activity to model. Then the investigators entered the chosen
two months of data into Watson, which they used to analyze
the data and automatically chart relationships among events.
Watson charts showed events and transactions in sequence,
making it easy for the grand jury to understand how each related
to the next, and to see how the overall scheme operated. Not
only was the suspect indicted after a 15 minute presentation,
but the case never went to trial. Within a week, the offender
pleaded guilty to misapplication of funds by a fiduciary.
He was sentenced to 10 years in prison, plus restitution.
So clear was the Watson based presentation that “the
scam was right here in front of my face,” Sergeant Creech
said. “Watson saved me a great deal of time trying to
draw and redraw charts.” he said. “It saved my
investigator time in presentation to the grand jury. And it
has saved our taxpayers and our grand jurors a whole lot of
headaches.”
The Task Force continues to analyze data for a wide variety
of cases using Watson. Cases have ranged from using automobile
license data to crack a pyramid scheme, to tracing a missing
person.
The Task Force also uses Watson to do post-mortem evaluations
of cases. In one case that the prosecution lost, investigators
had analyzed and charted the case data manually, before Watson
was available. The charts done by hand had been misleading,
Sergeant Creech said. Post-mortem analysis with Watson shifted
the focal point of the case.
“We wouldn’t have lost it if we’d had
Watson,” Sergeant Creech said.
|